Lattimore Law

Focus

Intellectual Property & Commercial Litigation.

Lattimore Law

Experience

Two decades litigating cases with claims ranging from the hundreds of thousands to hundreds of millions of dollars.

Lattimore Law

Diligence

A track record of effectively representing clients from large corporations to individual business professionals.

Lattimore Law

Call to Discuss your Case

Intellectual Property & Commercial Litigation

About the Firm You've come to the right place

This firm is dedicated to providing clients with first-rate representation in intellectual property and commercial matters. Having practiced at some of this nation’s largest and most well respected firms, and having litigated numerous complex, hard-fought cases, Jason Lattimore has the ability and experience to serve his clients’ needs effectively. Mr. Lattimore practices under the guiding principle that effective representation requires tireless diligence, vigorous advocacy, and a strategic approach that is crafted exclusively to further the client’s interests. Accordingly, he gives his full dedication to each matter he handles, treating each client’s stake in the outcome as if it were his own.

Lattimore Law

20 Years Of Experience

Lattimore Law

our practice areas

Lattimore Law

Trademarks, Unfair Competition

Mr. Lattimore has been handling trademark matters for clients for fourteen years, and it is the primary focus of his practice. Mr. Lattimore is adept at handling the issues that arise in cases involving trademark infringement claims, as well as claims of false advertising, trade dress infringement, trademark counterfeiting, common law and state unfair competition, and claims arising under the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.

Lattimore Law

Patent Litigation

Mr. Lattimore frequently serves as counsel in patent matters in the District of New Jersey. He has been involved in a number of such cases, both as lead and local counsel, and has proven effective in achieving clients’ objectives.

fm=f 120770

Trade Secrets, Employee Mobility

Mr. Lattimore’s experience in this context includes matters involving highly technical engineering data and processes as well as cases where confidential business strategies and internal marketing data were the focus of the dispute. He has also litigated the enforceability and effect of confidentiality and non-compete agreements both in the employer-employee context as well as in the context of the sale of a business.

fm=f-QBQjw1x

Copyright Litigation

Mr. Lattimore focuses on copyright disputes involving written, visual and artistic works. He has been co-counsel in the representation of world renowned playwrights, movie producers and a best-selling author in copyright licensing and infringement litigation. He also has significant experience with copyright disputes involving material posted on the internet.

Lattimore Law

General Litigation & Counseling

Both Mr. Lattimore and Mr. Anglim are experienced civil litigators. Between them, they have handled cases involving a variety of industries and subject matters, including software development contracts, pharmaceutical distribution agreements, consumer fraud claims, class actions, disputes involving partnerships and close corporations, product warehousing agreements, the False Claims Act, construction litigation, securities litigation, disputes among insurers, and various employment related disputes.

Schedule a Consultation

Representative Cases

  • Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al., Case No. 1:12-cv-5743 (D.N.J. 2012)
  • Codman & Shurleff, Inc. v. Integra Lifesciences Corp., Case No. 2:06-cv-2414 (D.N.J. 2006)
  • Cosmetic Warriors Limited v. Lush Day Spa, LLC, Case No. 13-cv-1697 (D.N.J. 2013)
  • Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Gray et al., Case No. 2:12-cv-1346 (D.N.J. 2012)
  • Ethicon, Inc. et al v. Artegraft, Inc., AAA Case No. 18 199 00136 96 (AAA Arbitration 1998)
  • Genpharm Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., AAA Case No. 50 180 T 00007 06 (AAA Arbitration 2006)
  • Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. et al., Case Nos. 2:09-cv-6335, 2:11-cv-3637 (D.N.J. 2009, 2011)
  • Intermodal Transportation Services, Inc. v. Efuel, Inc., AAA Case No. 31 E 181 0066 2 (AAA Arbitration 2004)
  • Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Tiger Mart, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:03-cv-1327 (D.N.J. 2003)
  • Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Trenton Grocery et al., Case No. 3:03-cv-1748 (D.N.J. 2003)
  • Maurizio v. Goldsmith, Case No. 1:96-cv-4332 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Case Nos. 2:08-cv-1204, 2272 & 3853 (D.N.J. 2008)
  • Norit Americas, Inc. v. ADA-ES, Inc. et al, Cause No. 08-0673 (71st Judicial Dist., Harrison County, Texas 2008)
  • Norit Americas, Inc. v. ADA-ES, Inc. et al, AAA Case. No. 30-192-Y-00718-09 (AAA Arbitration 2009)
  • Norit Americas, Inc. v. Energy Capital Partners I, LP et al., Docket No. ESX-C-304-09 (N.J. Super. 2009)
  • P.E.A. Films, Inc. v. Twentieth Century Fox (II), Case No. 1:02-cv-4481 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)
  • River Main Development, LLC v. City of Paterson, Docket No. PAS-L-3429-05 (N.J. Super. 2005)
  • Sleep Innovations, Inc. v. Sinomax USA Inc. et al., Case No. 2:06-cv-5712 (C.D. Cal. 2006)
  • Symbolic Systems, Inc. v. SGS Automotive Services, Inc., Docket No. BER-L-6386-03 (N.J. Super. 2003)
  • Teva Neuroscience, Inc. et al. v. Watson Pharma, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:10-cv-5078 (D.N.J. 2010)
  • TrialCard Inc. v. P.S.K.W. & Associates et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-5693 (D.N.J. 2011)
  • Trident Group v. Haddadin et al., Case No. 13-cv-7463 (D.N.J. 2013)
  • United States ex rel. Kenneth Fisher v. Network Software Associates, Inc. et al., Case No. 99-3095 (D.D.C. 1999)
  • Wilson v. Wilson et al., Docket No. C-48-02 (N.J. Super. 2002)
  • Wyeth v. Orgenus Pharma Inc. et al., Case No. 3:09-cv-3235 (D.N.J. 2009)